Case 01 /
BCBS239 data confidence programme
BCBS 239 data remediation with PwC, Microsoft Purview deployed across the critical data estate.
- Engagement
- Alpha Bank London, with PwC
- Sector
- Banking
- Regulatory frame
- BCBS 239
- BCBS 239 remediation
BCBS 239 data remediation with PwC, Microsoft Purview deployed across the critical data estate.
Alpha Bank London
- Outcome as stated
- A stronger evidence model for Critical Data Elements and finance reporting views, with improved data quality monitoring, traceable lineage and clearer stewardship.
01
Challenge
Finance and risk reporting confidence depended on evidence that was distributed across systems, spreadsheet processes, and informal ownership.
02
Operating context
A regulated banking environment where senior leaders needed confidence in Critical Data Elements, reporting views, ownership, and remediation sequencing.
03
Intervention
Implemented Critical Data Element identification, capture and monitoring processes and clarified ownership, with Microsoft Purview deployed across the critical data estate.
04
Board-level lesson
A board trusts reporting more when evidence is inspectable, owned, and linked to consequences rather than asserted through governance language alone.
The pattern is common in regulated data work: senior leaders do not only need a correct report. They need to know which data matters, who owns it, where it moves, what can break, and which remediation steps change the risk profile.
Evidence
What the programme produced
01
Identify, capture, monitor
Microsoft Purview deployed across the critical data estate.
Similar challenge
If the same pattern is showing up in your organisation, start with the decision at stake.
A useful first conversation clarifies the operating context, evidence gaps, ownership model, and practical 90-day sequence.